Loving parents usually listen to their children before making important decisions even if it means that
their views do not necessarily determine the final outcome. For example, one might ask for a child’s
opinion before buying a new house or deciding on a new school but that doesn’t mean that they get to
make the final decision. So when parents divorce it is only natural to discuss children’s preferences. An
influential therapist has said, “Children feel powerless at divorce and should be invited to make
suggestions that the adults will consider seriously. In this way they can feel active instead of passive
agents in the crisis.” FN1

However, when parents cannot agree on a parenting plan and the matter goes to court, one of the most
difficult issues facing parents, therapists and courts who are called upon to make decisions about
custody is the extent to which the preferences of children should be taken into account and the how
they should be taken into account. In many states, a child’s preferences must be taken into account in
determining their best interests.

In a custody case there seems to be a common misperception that once a child is twelve they get to
decide which parent they live with. This is an urban legend. FN2.

Similarly, a judge is not going to ask a child to testify who they want to live with. In fact, many judges are
extremely reluctant to allow a child to testify in court or even to speak to the judge privately in
chambers. They do not want to place the child into the middle of the dispute and add even more
emotional baggage for the child. Children in such situations end up carrying an enormous load of guilt if
they favor one parent at the expense of the other.

Nonetheless, a child may want to express a preference about where they want to live. In such cases,
there are usually ways for a court to hear the preferences of the children through a custody evaluation
by a therapist who is trained in interviewing children. FN3. Some jurisdictions may appoint a minor’s
counsel or guardian for the child. Before agreeing to such an appointment you should make sure that
the attorney has the proper training to interview children.

When children are interviewed about their preferences, an evaluator will want to know the rationale for
the child’s preferences and to consider them in the light of all circumstances of the family relationships
to understand how they fit into the child’s best interests.

The first question is whether the child is expressing a genuine preference or they are mirroring the
preference of one of the parents as a result of direct pressure or threats or a desire to please. In
dysfunctional relationships, preferences may reflect the child’s alignment with the parent they most fear,
or the parent they regard as the most unstable. Clues as to reliability can be discerned by the timing of
the child’s statements, the type of words used by the child, and the extent they mirror the parents
language. FN4

The second question is whether a child’s stated preference to live primarily with one parent is a result of
factors which are clearly not in their best interests. Younger children may lack the developmental
capacity to understand what life would really be like if their preferences became reality. They may not
have a mature sense of time and not have a clear idea what a week without one parent would be like.
Also a child may state a preference impulsively or for reasons which are not in their best interests. For
example, an adolescent boy may state that he wants to live with his father. Upon closer examination, the
evaluator finds out that the real reason for his preference is that the father provides no structure or
discipline, lets him drink, stay out all night and so forth. Another example, would be a 5 year old girl who
says she wants to live with her father because he buys her candy. Children are fickle and they may
express a preference as a result of some minor frustration, “Mom, made me do homework and wouldn’t
let me go out.” They may take a position in the heat of the moment just after an argument. Kids also
tend to think that the “grass is always greener” and their allegiances fluctuate depending who they’ve
just spent time with. That’s why a series of interviews over a period of time and after they’ve been with
each parent is a good idea.

Another problem with giving great weight to children’s preferences is that it may weaken a parent’s
authority over the kids, if the kids believe that they can control their parents by threatening, “If I don’t
get what I want, I’m telling the Judge that I don’t want to live with you anymore.”

The above reasons are not reasons why you should not consult with and listen carefully to your children’
s feelings and concerns when you divorce. However, it should be done sensibly with their best interests
in mind and children should not be made to feel that they are porns in a battle between two parents.

FN1.          Wallerstein and Blakeslee (1989).
FN2.         In Texas, however, a child may file with the court an affidavit stating who they would like to
live with. Texas Family Code section 153.008.
FN3.        An excellent review is Richard A. Warshak’s “Payoffs and Pitfalls of Listening to
Children.” Family Relations, 2003, Vol 52, No. 4.
FN4.         The Art and Science of Custody Evaluations (2007) Gould and Martindale.

Contact a Divorce Lawyer LA at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell to discuss your custody
issues.
Please call to make an appointment at 310.247.9913.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

return to top of page < HOME

© 2009 Warren R. Shiell. All rights reserved. D ivorce Lawyer LA. The information contained in
this website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this
Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when
this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.